Why the “Everything Platform” is Failing the Market
Software as a Service (SaaS) was originally sold to the business world on a very simple promise: it would make work faster, smarter, and incredibly efficient. You would no longer have to buy massive on-premise servers or clunky all-in-one software suites that took years to implement. Yet, looking at the enterprise software landscape today, we have come full circle. The nimbleness of early cloud computing has been replaced by the "Bloated SaaS Era," where major providers force generic, bloated processes onto businesses, charging a premium for software suites filled with features most teams will never touch.
Tech giants are engaged in an arms race to build the ultimate "everything platform." But as they keep acquiring their way into new verticals, they are fundamentally ignoring what the market actually wants: agility, deep functionality, and genuine interoperability.
To understand just how far the industry has strayed, you have to look at how the modern SaaS movement began. In the late 1990s, the CRM market was dominated by a colossal, on-premise giant: Siebel Systems. Founded by former Oracle executive Thomas Siebel, the company sold heavy, incredibly complex software that required businesses to purchase expensive servers, hire specialized IT teams, and spend months (typically years) on implementation.
When Marc Benioff (another Oracle alum) founded Salesforce in 1999, his entire value proposHere is what modern terns suggest what businesses are actually looking for:ition was built on destroying the bloated Siebel model. Salesforce championed the "cloud," pioneering a subscription-based SaaS model that was lightweight, fast, and accessible through a simple web browser. In one of the most famous marketing stunts in tech history, Salesforce literally hired actors to stage a mock protest outside a Siebel Systems conference in March 2000. The actors marched with signs declaring "The End of Software" to drive home the point that on-premise monoliths were dead. Salesforce won that war because the market desperately needed agility. They eventually crushed Siebel by offering a focused, single-purpose tool that just worked, proving that businesses didn't want to be locked into massive, bloated, million-dollar tech ecosystems.
Today, in a profound twist of irony, Salesforce has become the very monolithic giant they once protested. As the company grew into a behemoth with a market cap nearing $200 billion, their strategy shifted from organic innovation to aggressive corporate empire-building. Instead of just being the best CRM, Salesforce decided it needed to be your analytics hub, your internal chat app, your marketing engine, and your integration layer. They spent staggering amounts of capital to acquire swaths of companies.
The sales pitch for these acquisitions is always the same: “One vendor, one unified ecosystem.” But the reality for the end-user is often vastly different. For those non-techy people, the reason so many programs you use feel like they can't work together, is because they cant. When a tech giant buys a dozen independent companies, they are buying a dozen different codebases, disparate design philosophies, and separate data architectures. Instead of a seamless user experience, these mega-platforms frequently devolve into a stitched-together, "Frankenstein-like monstrosity" where the individual components don't naturally communicate with one another. You might be buying under the "Salesforce" banner, but under the hood, making these acquired platforms talk to each other requires massive amounts of custom development.
The Platform Gravity Trap: When a vendor bundles your database, chat, analytics, and CRM, your switching costs skyrocket. What starts as an "easy, all-in-one" convenience quickly morphs into operational lock-in, where your business loses the flexibility to adapt.
The backlash against SaaS bloat is already happening. IT leaders and CIOs are increasingly moving away from a default "single vendor" mindset toward a more composable, modular approach. The era of the "everything app" in B2B software is resting on shaky foundations. By trying to serve every conceivable business need, massive platforms risk diluting the core functionality that made them great in the first place. If tech giants continue to prioritize acquisitions over organic, seamless integration, they will inevitably bleed customers to leaner, faster, best-of-breed startups that are happy to do one thing perfectly. Just like Salesforce once did to Siebel Systems.
The CRM Wars: How Salesforce Crushed Oracle & Siebel Systems
This breakdown explores the 1990s CRM battles and how Marc Benioff's disruptive "No Software" campaign revolutionized the market by outmaneuvering legacy on-premise giants.
Subscribe to the Blog
Get notified exactly when I post a new essay. No spam, no newsletters, just an alert when a new post goes live.